Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2003-03-31 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2003-03-31 House Journal Page 0717 HB 90 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 90 "An Act relating to a salmon product development tax credit under the Alaska fisheries business tax and the Alaska fisheries resource landing tax; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page FSH RPT CS(FSH) NT 2DP 3AM 464 LETTER OF INTENT WITH FSH REPORT 465 FN1: (REV) 466 2003-03-31 House Journal Page 0718 FIN RPT CS(FIN) NT 4DP 5NR 632 FN2: (REV) 633 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 90(FIN) "An Act relating to a salmon product development tax credit and a salmon utilization tax credit under the Alaska fisheries business tax; and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 90(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 90(FIN) was read the third time. Representatives Ogg and Weyhrauch moved and asked unanimous consent that they be allowed to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and the members were required to vote. The question being: "Shall CSHB 90(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 90(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 29 NAYS: 6 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Fate, Foster, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Joule, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Nays: Croft, Gara, Gatto, Kerttula, Masek, Stoltze Excused: Chenault, Dahlstrom, Gruenberg, Kapsner 2003-03-31 House Journal Page 0719 Absent: Moses And so, CSHB 90(FIN) passed the House. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 90(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.